By Nancy Lapid
Oct 7 (Reuters) – With all the dire predictions about AI’s potential to wipe out humanity, today we highlight two studies that use the technology for potential medical advances. We also report on a discovery at the cellular level that explains how tobacco smoke exposure can lead to lung cancer.
ROOM-TEMPERATURE STORAGE OF MRNA VACCINES MAY BE NEAR
Using artificial intelligence, researchers may have found a way to make vaccines based on mRNA technology, such as Moderna’s and Pfizer’s COVID shots, storable at room temperature, which would lower costs and make them available in regions where ultra-cold storage is not possible.
Presently, mRNA vaccines, including Moderna’s new flu shot, must be stored at extremely low temperatures, typically ranging from -40 to -123 degrees Fahrenheit (-40 to -86 Celsius).
That is because messenger RNA is extremely fragile and breaks down easily at higher temperatures.
With help from artificial intelligence, researchers tweaked the formulation of the lipid nanoparticles that carry the mRNA in the vaccines, making the particles more heat-resistant.
Using this approach, they formulated vaccines that could remain stable even when stored at room temperature for up to a year, or at nearly 100 degrees Fahrenheit for two months, according to a report published in Nature Biotechnology.
Mice that were vaccinated with these particles, even after long-term storage, showed equivalent immune responses to mice that received vaccines carried by lipid nanoparticles similar to the original formulation used by Moderna.
“Cold-chain requirements add considerable infrastructure costs throughout the product life cycle, including specialized packaging, ultra-cold storage, temperature-controlled transport and continuous monitoring,” the researchers noted in their report.
Vaccines that tolerate higher temperatures could reduce storage costs by up to 86%, they added.
“Our approach broadens the application of not only mRNA vaccines, but also therapeutics or advanced drug-delivery platforms like controlled-release particles or microneedle patches, which requires the formulation to either be in solid state or to be stable at higher temperature,” study leader Jinbi Tian of MIT said in a statement.
DETECTING HEART REJECTION WITHOUT BIOPSY AFTER TRANSPLANT
AI may improve doctors’ ability to detect heart transplant rejection without surgery and appeared to be more accurate than standard blood tests, according to a report in Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.
The current gold standard for diagnosing heart transplant rejection is the surgical removal of a small piece of heart muscle, which is then examined under a microscope for inflammation and other changes.
Certain commonly used blood tests can help identify rejection but often produce false-positive test results, which lead to unnecessary biopsies, the researchers said.
Using data from 389 adult heart transplant recipients, the research team trained artificial intelligence models to recognize rejection using patterns detected in more than 5,000 electrocardiography readings and to add that information to blood test results.
In a different group of 38 male and female heart transplant recipients, the researchers found the model correctly identified 100% of patients who were not experiencing rejection.
The blood tests alone would have incorrectly flagged 19 patients as potentially needing a biopsy, the researchers said.
There was a 97% probability that a person with a negative test result truly did not have rejection.
“Our results highlight that electrocardiograms contain an abundance of physiological information that can be used to substantially improve the accuracy of detection and enable earlier diagnosis and treatment for patients with cardiac transplant rejection,” study leader Dr. Lior Jankelson of the NYU Grossman School of Medicine said in a statement.
The researchers now plan to test their model in more patients at several transplant centers.
HOW CHRONIC TOBACCO SMOKE EXPOSURE ADDS TO LUNG CANCER RISK
Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke makes cells that maintain and repair the lungs more vulnerable to cancer-causing gene alterations, according to new research.
Using mini-lungs grown from lung stem cells in the laboratory, researchers observed changes in lung cells over six months of exposure to chemicals and particles contained in cigarette smoke.
The chronic exposure altered gene programming and gene activity in the lung cells, creating distinct precancerous states, according to a report published in PNAS.
Among the notable changes was suppression of inflammatory and immune signaling pathways and genes involved in programmed cell death.
When researchers introduced two gene variants commonly associated with smoking-related lung cancer, KRAS and TP53, the altered stem cell populations responded differently.
KRAS mutations drove lung adenocarcinomas primarily from cells derived from so-called bronchioalveolar stem cells, while loss of the tumor suppressor gene TP53 produced squamous cell carcinomas derived from basal stem cells.
Researchers have long known that mutations in genes such as KRAS and TP53 can drive lung cancer. But the mutations are also seen in normal or precancerous tissue, suggesting that on their own, they may not be sufficient to start cancer.
To test whether cigarette smoke exposure made the cells more susceptible to transformation by cancer-driving mutations, the researchers implanted smoke-exposed mini-lungs and unexposed mini-lungs in mice.
Only the smoke-exposed organoids containing one of the genetic alterations formed tumors. Cigarette smoke exposure alone did not produce tumors, nor did introducing the genetic alterations into organoids not exposed to smoke.
The findings help explain how environmental exposure, chemical changes and genetic mutations may work together during the earliest stages of non-small cell lung cancer, the most common type of lung cancer, the researchers said.
Study leader Michelle Vaz of Johns Hopkins University expressed excitement about the prospects of using this knowledge, in combination with other therapies, to come up with drugs that “help tumors that currently do not respond to treatment, respond better.”
(To receive the full newsletter in your inbox for free sign up here)
(Reporting by Nancy Lapid; Editing by Bill Berkrot)
